Which order should be obeyed first when there are conflicting commands?

In situations where conflicting commands are issued, the latter order takes precedence because it reflects the most current directive and intention of the authority giving the command. This principle is based on the understanding that the latest instruction typically incorporates or overrides previous commands, ensuring clarity and reducing confusion in the operational environment. By following the latest instruction, personnel align their actions with the most up-to-date operational strategy or requirements that have been communicated.

In contrast, considering the earlier order or the order that seems most relevant may lead to misunderstandings or inconsistencies in execution, as those commands may no longer apply or hold the same priority. Similarly, the command from a senior officer is important, but if it conflicts with a more recent directive, the latter order should be adhered to ensure unity of action and adherence to the latest tactical framework. Therefore, the priority given to the latter order ensures effective and coherent responses in dynamic situations.